Sentence examples for the target clause from inspiring English sources
noun
A butt or mark to shoot at, as for practice, or to test the accuracy of a firearm, or the force of a projectile.
- Take careful aim at the target.
The participants clicked the mouse to decide whether the probe matched the meaning of the target clause.
For the target clause (6) 要不是颱風來了 yàobúshì__táifēng__lái__le if-it-were-not__hurricane__come__ASP If it wasn't that the hurricane had come .
In Table 1, the TA probes undergo different numbers of mental operations compared to the two representations from the target clause and the probe.
Other simple interactions of the target clause positions and polarities were observed on the sentences with true statements (F 1,62) = 33.50, p < .001) and on the sentences with false statements (F 1,62) = 11.93, p = .001).001
Thus, 128 experimental trials were presented to all of the participants who were required to respond to the truth value of matching each probe sentence and the target clause based on their comprehension.
A four-way repeated-measures ANOVA was conducted with the target clause positions (antecedents as clause 1, consequents as clause 2), truth values (true, false), and polarities (affirmative, negation) as the within-participants factors, together with the groups (college students, junior high teenagers, elementary children) as the between-participants factor.
The correct responses for the target clauses were subjected to analysis.
Further analyses were conducted to investigate whether the counterfactual target clauses embedded in different test sentences caused a mental processing difference (the antecedents of CC sentences, hereafter, CC1; the consequents of CC sentences, CC2; the counterfactual target clause in CF sentences, CF1; and the counterfactual target clauses in FC sentences, FC2).
Further investigation on the possible target clause position effect in counterfactual comprehension was analyzed.
No simple interaction in the CC2 and FC2 target clause types was observed.
The analysis included three within-participants factors (target clause type, truth value, polarity) together with groups as a between-participants factor.
