Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
the system was designed
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "the system was designed" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the purpose or intention behind the creation of a system, often in technical or analytical contexts. Example: "The system was designed to improve efficiency and reduce errors in data processing."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Academia
Wiki
Formal & Business
Encyclopedias
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
57 human-written examples
"The system was designed to kill you," he said.
News & Media
The system was designed to coördinate 3,000 different zones.
News & Media
The system was designed to be largely automated in behavior.
Academia
The system was designed and built.
But the system was designed to move, eventually, to an entirely cloud-based ecosystem.
News & Media
Before deregulation, he added, "the system was designed so that this happened rarely.
News & Media
The system was designed to "allow the public to choose the privacy level that suits them.
News & Media
The system was designed to give the outward appearance of popular participation without actually involving it.
Encyclopedias
That may have been true in 1911, when the system was designed.
News & Media
The system was designed so that only ROM code, not user programs, can deactivate the protection.
The system was designed for the economy of a century ago.
Academia
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing a system, follow "the system was designed" with a clear explanation of its intended function or purpose. This provides context and clarifies the system's value.
Common error
Avoid using "the system was designed" without specifying who designed it. If possible, rephrase to active voice (e.g., 'Engineers designed the system') for clarity and accountability.
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "the system was designed" functions as a passive construction used to describe the intent or purpose behind the creation of a particular system. As confirmed by Ludwig, this phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used.
Frequent in
Science
31%
News & Media
31%
Academia
14%
Less common in
Wiki
7%
Formal & Business
5%
Encyclopedias
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "the system was designed" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive construction. As Ludwig AI confirms, it serves to explain the purpose and intent behind a system's creation, often appearing in neutral to formal contexts such as science, news media, and academia. For clarity, ensure you specify the system's intended function and, when possible, identify the designers. Consider alternatives like "the system was created" or "the system was developed" for a more active voice. Remember that a proper use improves the quality and clarity of your writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
the system was created
This alternative uses 'created' instead of 'designed', focusing on the act of making the system.
the system was developed
This alternative uses 'developed', suggesting a more gradual and evolutionary process.
the system was intended
This alternative shifts the focus to the intended purpose or outcome of the system.
the system was built
This alternative emphasizes the construction or assembly of the system.
the system was engineered
This alternative suggests a more technical and precise approach to the system's creation.
the system was conceived
This alternative highlights the initial idea or concept behind the system.
the system aimed
This alternative focuses on the goal of the system.
the intention of the system was
This alternative rephrases the sentence to emphasize the system's purpose.
the system's purpose was
This alternative directly states the system's objective.
the design of the system was
This alternative converts the verb into a noun phrase.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "the system was designed" to sound more active?
You can use active voice constructions such as "designers created the system", or "engineers designed the system" to make the sentence more direct and emphasize the agency of the designers.
What is the difference between saying "the system was designed for" versus "the system was designed to"?
"The system was designed for" typically indicates the intended users or purpose, while "the system was designed to" specifies the intended function or action. For example, "the system was designed for students" versus "the system was designed to track attendance".
What are some alternatives to "the system was designed" that emphasize different aspects of its creation?
Alternatives include phrases like "the system was built" (emphasizing construction), "the system was developed" (highlighting gradual improvement), or "the system was engineered" (stressing technical precision).
Is it better to use active or passive voice when describing how a system was designed?
Using active voice is often preferable for clarity and directness, but passive voice (e.g., "the system was designed") is acceptable when the designer is unknown or when the focus is on the system itself. Both are grammatically correct, but active voice typically makes the writing more engaging.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested