Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(25)
Eighty-two percent of the study population compared with 4.1% of controls had been exposed to lectures or teaching in diagnostic radiology prior to completing the questionnaire.
The only considerable difference was found in the percentage of men and women (8.5% more men among the study population compared with nonresponders).
A higher prevalence of overweight and obesity was found in the study population compared with the general population in Belgium.
This selection increased the prevalence of breast malignancy in the study population compared with the target population.
Our findings, thus, indicate a substantial increased criminal activity in the study population compared to the general population.
A larger number of lean sows from group A (34 sows) left the study population compared to group M (23 sows).
Similar(35)
In addition to the raw scores, we calculated T-scores for the CBCL syndrome and DSM-oriented scales that indicate how scores for the study population compare with normative scores for children of the same age and sex.
When describing characteristics of the study population, comparing functions and EQ-5D, the cohort was divided in three different groups, based on the total burden of net days SLDP the year before MMR; no SLDP, part-time SLDP (< 360 days) and full-time SLDP (≥360 days).
Finally, a comparison was made between the frequency of BRCA2 mutations in this study population compared to the frequency of BRCA2 mutations in breast ovarian cancer families.
Thus, the lack of concordance reported in some studies might be ascribed also to the different site where QST was performed, besides the relatively less homogeneity of the study population comparing with our study.
Even so, results among the 6 11 year olds were substantially the same when exposure quartiles were based on the overall distribution of phthalates in the total study population compared to the results based on the age/gender specific quartiles.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com