Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Limitations of this study include the lower than expected response rate, potential bias introduced by 9% of the study population choosing not to provide blood for HIV-testing, and the 17% lower than expected sample size causing a small reduction in power leading to our ability to only detect effects from 1.3 to 1.6 fold.
Similar(59)
Since the study population chosen to assess the association with cognitive, functional, mood, and QoL variables had no major cognitive impairment and health disorders, IADL and SBI-BADL were distributed in a highly asymmetrical way, i.e. the great majority of elderly persons had few or no problems in the activities of daily living.
In women, the reported prevalence, however, differs according to the study population chosen and to the criteria applied to the interpretation of MRI findings [ 22 – 26 ].
This was the first study in Greece aiming to measure health-state utilities and willingness to pay in any health problem and the study population chosen was end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on dialysis.
The risk varies in different studies, which could depend on the study populations chosen, age and other factors, including secular trends for RA per se.
Both study populations chose to start a new intervention in the setting of a clinical trial, so presumably all were equally motivated to improve their diabetes management.
The study population was chosen to represent young children living in an area with seasonal intense malaria transmission and the results should be broadly generalizable to such populations.
The study population was chosen to represent the target population for a malaria vaccine: at risk, malaria-experienced children living in an area of intense malaria transmission.
The study population was chosen as previous studies [ 11, 12].
The total size of the study population was chosen in order to get 1,000 probes for analysis.
The study population was chosen based on Ministry of health national survey data obtained in 2010 and the study was performed in February 2012 [ 47, 48].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com