Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
We investigated their functional relevance for the trait in question, reviewed expression studies and analysed further immune related genes located in the regions.
The study in question is a systematic review of cohort studies that have looked at this and, in 19 studies on a total of 68,094 people, found no evidence that LDL cholesterol levels predicted mortality.
The study in question is actually a review paper that was released in December.
When consensus is not attained, a third reviewer independently reviews the study in question and makes a final decision.
The Royal Society also abandoned the normal protocols of choosing a review team with specific scientific qualifications to evaluate the study in question.
Discussion was conducted in cases of disagreement, and a consensus would be reached on whether the studies in question would be included in the present review.
The studies in question have already gone through the rigorous checks and balances of the scientific peer review process.
If practitioners were eligible and interested, an in-person visit was scheduled with study staff to review the study in detail, answer questions and obtain informed consent if the practitioner wanted to participate.
Although the studies in this review asked similar questions (i.e., enoxaparin vs. heparin, pharmacologic prophylaxis vs. SCDs) and had similar patient populations, the scarcity of good quality studies with low risk of biases prevents definitive conclusions.
Only one of the studies in this review focused on this question.
The scoping review is a knowledge synthesis technique that is most commonly used when: it is difficult to identify a narrow review question; studies in the reviewed sources are likely to have employed a range of data collection and analysis techniques; no prior synthesis has been undertaken on the topic; and a quality assessment of reviewed sources is not going to be conducted [ 14].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com