In all cases, the backbone of the calculated structures deviated by less than 0.7 Å from the backbone of the structure shown in Figure 2. Recently, a method for automatic assignment of cross peaks in 13C-13C correlation spectra was developed[20].
With both templates, the adduct remained ring-closed, incoming nucleotides formed a Watson Crick pair with the complementary 5′ template nucleotides, and the overall active site structures deviated from the catalytically competent conformation.
However, the SCR-13 and SCR-20 structures deviated notably from this superimposed view.
However, these putative tncRNA precursor structures deviated significantly from the miRNA hairpins in key features and they were found to be poorly conserved in closely related species.
The backbone of the resulting structure deviated by 0.5 Å from the high-resolution solid-state structure.
The backbone of the resulting structure deviated by 0.6 Å from the high-resolution solution-state structure.
The analysis found a five-factor model but the factor structure deviated from the theoretical expectation [ 14].
Nevertheless, when using these three CHHC spectra together with the 2D NHHC spectrum, the resulting structure deviated by less than 0.7 Å (rms value for all N, Cα, CO backbone atoms) from the structure shown in Figure 2. To ii): At the end of pass 1 and 2 the PASD algorithm calculates likelihood estimates that each particular assignment associated with a cross-peak is correct.
The resulting structure deviated by less than 0.3 Å (rms value for all N, Cα, CO backbone atoms) from the structure shown in Figure 2. To v): For both KTX solution) and KTX solid), structure calculations were performed without and with restraints for the three disulphide bonds.
The resulting structure deviated by less than 0.7 Å (rms value for all N, Cα, CO backbone atoms) from the structure shown in Figure 2. To iv): Peak intensities obtained from the 2D CHHC and NHHC spectra were classified into four ranges and converted into distance ranges of 1.8 2.7, 1.8 3.3, 1.8 5.0 and 1.8 6.0 Å, respectively.
The empirical factor structure deviated some from its theoretical expectation particularly in terms of the emotional and social functioning, daily activities, and communication subscales.
