Sentence examples for the statute stated from inspiring English sources

The UN Secretary-General, in his report accompanying the Statute, stated in relation to Article 29 that the establishment of the ICTY pursuant to Chapter VII "creates a binding obligation on all States to take whatever steps are required to implement" a decision of the Tribunal (UNSC 1993, para. 125 .35.

"The statute states that when there are two ballots from the same person, you open the first one and not the second.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia has criticized the statute, stating that the clause was so poorly defined that it could be the basis for prosecuting "a mayor for using the prestige of his office to get a table at a restaurant without a reservation".

The statute states that an officer can use deadly force in cases when "[h]e or she reasonably believes that such deadly force is necessary to protect himself," "[w]hen he reasonably believes that such use of deadly force is immediately necessary to effect the arrest" and when the subject "[m]ay otherwise endanger life or inflict serious physical injury unless arrested without delay".

When James VII revived the Order, the statutes stated that the Order would continue the ancient number of Knights, which was described in the preceding warrant as "the Sovereign and twelve Knights-Brethren in allusion to the Blessed Saviour and his Twelve Apostles".

One of the statutes states that joint physical custody is chosen over other arrangements unless it is not in the best interest for the children, or in other words it is the preferred arrangement.

That statute states the appointment of electors shall be conclusive only if made pursuant to laws enacted prior to election day.

The Supreme Court has ruled that American law cannot extend to activities outside the country unless the statute clearly states otherwise.

Beyond that, the statute clearly states that any and all penalty fees and charges should be "reasonable and proportional," which is to say not usurious.

On June 10 , 1991 however, the District Court declared the statute unconstitutional, stating that it violated both the Fourteenth and Seventeenth Amendments due to the failure to ensure "popular participation" through the use of primary elections.

"Seems to me his intent as a voter is plain enough, you see?" I agreed with this but pointed out that the statutes definitely stated that all ballots defaced in any manner must not be counted.