Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
The statute in question contains many provisions.
The statute in this case seems pretty clear.
The statute, in effect, is stricken down on its face.
"What D.O.J. is saying is clearly contrary to the statute in our view," Armold says.
That rebuff angered Catalans mightily, especially as they had voted for the statute in a referendum.
The Renaissance board has not cited the statute in this case.
That's the section where they construe the statute in view of these ambiguities and so forth.
MR. TRIBE -- You can just read the statute in 1989 and it says "may".
(J.A. 360599). Yet Congress, even though it amended the statute in 1965, 79 Stat.
In our opinion, they sustain the power of the state to enact the statute in question.
The statute in terms thus gives the Commission power to prescribe such rates prospectively only.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com