He contends that's the correct terminology.
The Mail supplemented the hypocrisy statute with a morality clause, contending that lapses, often in the sexual realm, disqualify one from having a credible opinion about anything else.
The government, however, contends that the statute does not explicitly allow damages for emotional distress claims.
In Federal Aviation Administration v. Cooper, a case argued this week in the Supreme Court, the government contends that the statute allows a plaintiff to recover "actual damages" only for monetary losses, but not for emotional distress.
The suit contends that the statute is unconstitutional because the state relied on a religious standard to reject Mr. Kalman's business name and because an employee was allowed to refuse a business name that offended him or her.
This is because the government contends that the statute's ban on "unauthorized access" to someone else's computer is a felony, period, with potential penalties you'd associate with serious violent crime.
Environmentalists like Mr. Schaeffer contend that had utilities like Southern followed the new source review statute and installed pollution-control technologies years ago, the cuts in noxious emissions would be even more substantial now.
In civil lawsuits, plaintiffs like the doctors' group use the civil provisions of the RICO statute to contend that they have been economically harmed through a pattern of misconduct.
His lawyer, John W. Mitchell, said outside the courtroom that Mr. Rizzuto's defense would focus on the statute of limitations, contending that the crimes that prosecutors say made up the conspiracy were not sufficiently related to one another.
The Justice Department contends that they lack standing because they would not be detained under the statute for their activities – although earlier in the case, it initially refused to make such assurances.
