Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Since the omissions were caused by a systematic error and not by patients' refusal to answer certain questions (because they felt uncomfortable to do so for instance) considering these single items as lost should have no further impact on the statistical proceedings.
Similar(59)
Fuchs published papers with Born on "The Statistical Mechanics of Condensing Systems" and "On Fluctuations in Electromagnetic radiation" in the Proceedings of the Royal Society.
The statistical findings are irrelevant.
The statistical picture is mixed.
The statistical summary is here.
"The statistical methods are shoddy.
Nielsen led the statistical analysis.
conducted the statistical analyses.
developed the statistical model.
performed the statistical analyses.
Why the statistical caution?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com