Due to the presence of only small differences in sensitivity between the three effect sizes tested, the mean sensitivity across the effect sizes is used for comparison.
The sample sizes tested were 14, 12, 10, 8 and 6 samples.
The pore sizes tested had no significant effect on tissue generation.
When 15% PMME2000 was used as a precipitant, all the nanosphere sizes tested produced crystals.
The plot in Fig. 6 shows the execution time and performance for the training set sizes tested.
For all the maximum combination sizes tested, less than 80 out of 138 (58%) of the drugs are needed.
The minimum domain size was kept at 1600 atoms, and it was valid for the lowest two nanoparticle sizes tested.
The associated SNP was the one for which the sample size tested had most power to detect statistical evidence for association.
However, the power to detect association with these loci was poor in the sample size tested (20% and 17%, respectively).
Reductions to the smallest size tested (0.25 mm) continued to showed improvement over wider lands.
