Exact(3)
Table 5 demonstrates that the significant estimated slope coefficient ( {widehat{gamma}}_{42} ) was positive.
The significant estimated slope coefficients ( {widehat{beta}}_1 ) and ( {widehat{beta}}_2 ) were negative (i.e., −0.1117 and −0.0037 respectively).
In Table 6, the significant estimated slope coefficients ( {widehat{gamma}}_{531} ), ( {widehat{gamma}}_{532} ), and ( {widehat{gamma}}_{533} ) were both negative and positive.
Similar(57)
In addition, the estimated level of virus control from the significant estimates increases with the input value (the slope of the linear fit is 0.35).
It is noteworthy that most of the significant estimates are between the 25th and 75th quartiles, with positive net effects and negative thresholds that are not within range.
In Table 4 on the connections between financial size and public credit registries, most of the significant estimates are between the 25th and 75th quartiles, with positive net effects and negative thresholds that are not within range.
In Panel A (on banking system efficiency) and Panel B (on financial system efficiency), most of the significant estimates are between the 25th and 75th quartiles, with positive net effects and negative thresholds that are not within range.
These changes in opposite directions may cause the significant estimate for the interaction term in the longitudinal analyses comparing T1 and T2.
In contrast to the significant estimates of θI, estimates of θII (the type-II coefficient) were not significantly greater than zero.
IV), which indicated that variation in dS associated with recent vs. deeper divergence times does not explain the significant estimates of dN/dS in our dataset.
Repeating the analyses after excluding cases having their first diagnosis before assessment of maternal stress after pregnancy did not appreciably change the magnitude of the significant estimates in the models [all changes in hazard ratio (HR) were < 0.10].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com