For instance, if there are three eggs in a refrigerator, then corresponding to these eggs there exists the set containing the eggs, the set containing that set, the set containing that set, and so on.
Moreover, there is also a set containing two different sets namely, the set containing the eggs and the set containing the set containing the eggs and so on without end.
According to her view, she can see not only the three eggs but also the set containing them.
For instance, if there are three eggs in a refrigerator, then the set containing those eggs is also in the refrigerator.
From you, the set theorists derive the set containing you, then the set containing that set, then the set containing that larger set, and so on.
Corresponding to a ball, for instance, is the set containing the ball, the set containing its molecules, the set containing its atoms, and so on.
Corresponding to our ball, for instance, there is the set containing the ball, the set containing that set, the set containing that set, and so on; and there is the set containing the ball and the set containing the set containing the ball; and so on and on and on.
We define as the set containing all above events.
Let C be the set containing all the cameras.
The set containing NOR suffices as a complete logic set.
The set containing all the letters, however, is invariant under all permutations of letters.
