Sentence examples for the sequential trial from inspiring English sources

The result of the sequential trial analysis is shown in figure 4. Studies were displayed sequentially by their publication year, from left to the right of the horizontal line.

The boundaries for the sequential trial were calculated on the primary outcomes of a difference of cervical dilatation ≥1 millimetre, with the assumption of a type 1 error of 0.05 and a power of 0.95.

We refer to this approach as unconditional because, in a three-stage trial, for example, it produces an estimate of the treatment effect regardless of whether the trial stops at stage one, two, or three and it is therefore unbiased by definition when one averages across all possible realizations of the sequential trial.

Following the completion of the Sequential trials, all three subjects were given thirty Length-Only trials where the tools were within beak range (i.e., it was unnecessary to use a tool to probe for another).

In the Sequential trials described above, subjects retrieved and used tools that were significantly longer than the average tool length predicted by random probing, but often still shorter than required to reach the food.

The boundaries for the sequential trials were calculated on the primary outcomes of a difference of cervical dilatation ≥1 mm, with the assumption of a type 1 error of 0.05 and a power of 0.95.

Data from the sequential trials (Tournigand et al, 2004; Seymour et al, 2007) revealed that combination irinotecan regimens have higher frequencies of toxicity in the first-line setting compared to second-line setting, potentially indicating that only fitter trial patients received second-line chemotherapy.

aPC for the treatment of sepsis is a good example for illustrating the importance of using sequential trial analysis in evidence synthesis.

We aim to review and exemplify the value of group sequential trial designs (i.e., designs with one or more prospectively planned interim analyses) within the field of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

The authors in the current study used a sequential trial design with interim analyses approximately every 20 patients in order to reduce the number of patients exposed to "inferior" treatment through early study termination if treatment-related outcome differences emerged.

To measure skill on the SRTT, the mean reaction times of the last 50 sequential trials and the 50 random trials that followed were contrasted at each of the four testing blocks (A, B, C and D) of the task [9], [12].