Steve Penner of The Portsmouth Herald said the sequence of Poehler's statements to the park trooper was "worthy of her absolutely best SNL impressions".
After a subsequent element is selected, it is considered to be removed from (Set) for the current iteration, which consists in the execution of the statement (or a sequence of statements) (Stat).
The tools support the construction of a sequence of statements representing a dialogue flow from a player to a computer and vice-versa.
(Reordering Block) Given each transaction in the form of a sequence of statements (S = [s_1, s_2, ldots, s_n]), a reordering block B is a subsequence (B = [s_{i_1}, s_{i_2}, ldots, s_{i_m}]), where (1 le i_1< i_2< cdots < i_m le n), such that every statement (s_{i_j}) in block B does not depend on any statement (s') in other reordering blocks in terms of data flow.
In fact, we clearly show that a sequence of statements from the partial KKM principle to the Nash equilibria can be obtained for any space satisfying the partial KKM principle.
Thus, a proof of a theorem of logic, say φ, is therefore any finite sequence of statements (with φ the final statement in the sequence) such that each member of the sequence: (a) is one of the logical axioms of the formal system, or (b) follows from previous members of the sequence by a rule of inference.
Shrien looked less and less innocent as detectives and journalists picked apart the sequence of events described, and the statements he had made.
In essence, he defined a proof to be any finite sequence of statements such that each statement in the sequence either is an axiom or follows from previous members by a valid rule of inference.
We remark that, in the case that the sequence of (s_{k}) is positive, the statement of Lemma 2 follows from Lemma 1, (v) and Theorem 1 in [23] combined with Lemma 3.5.9 in [21] or with Lemma 8.2.2 in [22].
Gödel's trick was to drive the sequence of operations modifying the initial statement, to lead to a very particular conclusion.
