Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(18)
The reliability and factor structure of the scale was evaluated and implications for future research are discussed.
Items were then reviewed by a measurement expert for clarity and appropriateness and the scale was evaluated for reading level.
The factorial structure of the scale was evaluated using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), but since the scale items were dichotomous, the model was estimated using tetrachoric correlations and the weighted least squares mean and variance adjusted estimation procedure implemented in Mplus 6.1 (Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA).
Internal consistency of the scale was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha.
The scale was evaluated and translated into Swedish by a bilingual panel of HIV experts.
The internal consistency of the scale was evaluated by calculating Cronbach's alpha coefficient.
Similar(42)
Furthermore, in two independent samples the psychometric properties of the scale are evaluated by applying the linear partial credit model.
However, the 3-factor structure of the scale has never been confirmed via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), nor has the scale been evaluated with a racially diverse sample of children.
The reliability, validity, and factor analytic structure of the scale were evaluated, and reference scores for study samples were calculated.
The psychometric properties of the scale were evaluated.
Construct validity, reliability and concurrent validity of the scale were evaluated using Stata v10.0.
More suggestions(15)
the scale was calibrated
the scale was estimated
the efficiency was evaluated
the scale were evaluated
the investigation was evaluated
the scale was administrated
the program was evaluated
the scale was developed
the scale was established
the microtexture was evaluated
the scale was implemented
the scale was anchored
the scale was divided
the Program was evaluated
the scale was illustrated
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com