the right of

USAGE SUMMARY

"the right of" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is used to indicate a right or entitlement to something, either by law or by custom. For example, "All citizens have the right of freedom of speech."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

They have the right of appeal.

The New York Times - Sports

It's the right of every person.

The New York Times

One is the "right of abode".

The Economist

"He was to the right of me.

Independent

Who would yield the right of way?

The New York Times - Travel

"The tug had the right of way.

The New York Times

"I give them the right of way".

The New York Times

To the right of the stage".

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

3 human-written examples

The right-of-way continues northward as U.S. Route 9.

Wikipedia

Pedestrians always have the right-of –way.

WikiHow

Traffic already in the roundabout has the right-of-way.

WikiHow

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Pair "the right of" with a specific noun or gerund to clarify the nature of the right (e.g., "the right of appeal", "the right of way", "the right of expression").

Common error

Avoid using "the right of" in overly broad or undefined contexts. Instead of saying "they have the right of things", specify what precise entitlement or permission is being discussed.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "the right of" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase, typically introducing a noun that specifies a particular entitlement, privilege, or legal guarantee. It is frequently used to denote fundamental freedoms or permissions.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

32%

Wiki

21%

Science

18%

Less common in

Formal & Business

16%

Encyclopedias

8%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "the right of" is a common prepositional phrase used to assert an entitlement or freedom. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread use across diverse sources like News & Media, Science and Wiki. While it’s considered grammatically sound, ensure that the right being referenced is clearly defined to avoid vagueness. Substitute it with phrases like "entitlement to" or "privilege of" to add variety to your writing. Remember to specify the right for clarity, such as "the right of assembly".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

the entitlement to

This alternative focuses on the justified claim or privilege one possesses.

the privilege of

This suggests a special advantage or opportunity granted to someone.

the authority for

This highlights the official permission or power to do something.

the liberty to

This emphasizes the freedom or autonomy to act in a certain way.

the prerogative to

This indicates an exclusive right or privilege held by a person or group.

the power to

This focuses on the capacity or ability to influence or control something.

the license to

This implies a formal permission or authorization to engage in a specific activity.

the faculty of

This refers to an inherent ability or power possessed by someone.

the option to

This suggests a choice or possibility available to someone.

the wherewithal to

This highlights the necessary means or resources to accomplish something.

FAQs

How is "the right of" used in legal contexts?

In legal contexts, "the right of" often refers to specific entitlements protected by law, such as "the "right of appeal"", "the "right of way"", or "the "right of assembly"". These phrases denote legally recognized freedoms or permissions.

What are some common synonyms for "the right of"?

While "the right of" is widely used, you can sometimes substitute it with phrases like "the "entitlement to"", "the "privilege of"", or "the "authority for"" depending on the specific meaning you wish to convey.

Is it ever incorrect to use "the right of"?

While grammatically correct, using "the right of" can be vague if the context doesn't clearly define what right is being referenced. In such cases, specifying the right more precisely will improve clarity.

How does "the right of" differ from simply saying "the right to"?

While similar, "the right of" often introduces a noun or gerund describing the right (e.g., "the right of ownership"), while "the right to" is typically followed by a verb (e.g., "the right to speak"). Both are valid, but they structure sentences differently.