If a moderate or serious problem was reported, patients were asked questions on: the level of help received from relatives; the level of help needed and received from services (none = 0, low = 1, moderate = 2, high = 3); and, finally, whether they received the right type (adequate = 1; not adequate = 0) and the right amount of help (satisfied = 1; not satisfied = 0).
Moreover, there is often no demonstrated proof that the state has taken steps to the maximum of their available resources in order to provide adequate relief as part of the efforts to realise the right to adequate food.
Analysis between groups showed differences in responses on: whether everyone has a right to adequate food; who was supposed to supply relief food; whether relief food was adequate; and preferred choice on the means to ensure the right to adequate food.
However, despite admission that relief food is often inadequate, people did not trust that it is the most desired means to achieve their right to adequate food; land for food production was still the widely preferred choice as the means to realise the right to adequate food of disaster victims.
"But the right to adequate housing is not the right to own a structure – four walls and a roof.
Yet, despite its impact, the denial of the right of adequate housing is rarely internationally condemned or discussed.
We can eradicate poverty, maintain food security and ensure the right to adequate and nutritious food for all.
In principle, under the communist government of East Germany, every citizen and family had the right to adequate accommodations.
The right to adequate housing is just as essential as the right to be free from torture, or the right of freedom of expression.
"The UK faces a unique moment, when the challenge to promote and protect the right to adequate housing for all is on the agenda.
