Exact(1)
However, the comparison between deeper levels, such as order and genus, showed that the richness between both libraries is similar, although the groups found were different.
Similar(59)
There was a significant difference in the species richness among the land cover types (P = 0.011); however, there was no significant variation (P = 0.614) in the species richness between the districts.
The variation between seasons was not significant across any of the statistics considered (Wilcoxon signed-paired rank test), while the only significant difference among the districts (Wilcoxon signed-paired rank test, after Bonferroni correction, P = 0.03) was for the allelic richness between the Ankober (R S = 8.22) and Tarmaber districts (R S = 7.11; Table 1).
For comparing the species richness between normal and antral gastritis patients, the actual phylotype number for each patient was counted first.
Despite the lack of statistical differences in the estimated archaeal OTU richness between the samples, the values of the estimated Shannon diversity index presented some significant differences (Table 3).
We found only a slight difference in the species richness between isolated and non-isolated clear-cuts, both when all open-habitat species and when the subset of grassland species was compared.
There were no inter-station significant differences in the recorded species richness between the first (2.83±2.17) and second (3.67±1.47) collection periods.
In the Amblycera suborder (0 3 amblyceran lice per host) there was also a significant difference in the parasite species richness between the orders (F410,2 = 4.59, P = 0.01 Fig 1B and F410,2 = 17.57, P < 0.0001 after controlling for sampling effort, Fig 1D).
Likewise, we evaluated whether the negative co-variation was due to the differences in initial species richness between the ungrazed plots at the beginning of the study through partial correlation.
These sampling effort differences may have accounted for the differences in species richness between the SOND cruise and the present study.
Figures 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 show the lower-rank taxonomic groups of dominant phyla displayed in Figure 4 that predominantly account for the differences in genotype richness between the non-sulfidic and the sulfidic water samples.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com