Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(13)
The study found that peer review performs best when a degree of subjectivity (for example, their belief about whether the result is correct) is allowed, since this helps more information to be transmitted through the decision and protects against the risk of scientists converging on an incorrect answer.
So the result is correct when n + 1.
Specifically, if CI = 0, the result is correct clustering.
But if the result is correct, "it would be an impressive milestone," he says.
If the result is correct, the user moves to the next position.
The proof on p. 49 of Blok and Pigozzi (1989) is seriously garbled, though the result is correct.
Similar(46)
I told her the result was correct.
During the test, the result was correct from the moment the subject placed a part of his/her foot on the correct target.
An F test for this contrast was performed, and the result was corrected for multiple testing using FDR.
The carry-over samples were also spiked and the result was corrected by recovery, if the recovery % was over the range recoveries obtained during the validation.
That said, the effect was statistically weak - meaning the experiment would need to be replicated by another laboratory to have more confidence that the results are correct.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com