Sentence examples for the relevant statute from inspiring English sources

It was based upon where we could prove interception had occurred under the relevant statute.

After Patrick J. Sullivan, a Manhattan parent on the panel, pointed out the relevant statute, the city scrambled to call an emergency meeting of the panel for Friday, just hours before the expected Council vote.

The relevant statute is Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act, which says that any business with assets exceeding a million dollars and more than five hundred "shareholders of record" must register its securities with the S.E.C.

What Holder holds is that it's not just any assistance that is illegal; it's "material support," which includes, says the relevant statute, "any property, tangible or intangible, or service, including currency or monetary instruments or financial securities.

This was because the judge's instructions to the jury, which were diluted to reflect the prosecutors' (erroneous) interpretation of the relevant statute, failed to ask the jurors to decide whether Arthur Andersen knew it was doing something illegal.

"While it may be true that auction houses commonly withhold the names of consignors," Justice Peter B. Skelos of the appellate division said in his ruling, "this court is governed not by the practice in the trade, but by the relevant statute".

In other states, including Texas and Arkansas, officials said they were confident they were in compliance with the relevant statutes.

"This decision came only after reviewing all the evidence, testimonial evidence and physical evidence, after reviewing the relevant statutes, after reviewing the relevant case laws".

These complaints, which are drafted by A.U.S.A.s, have traditionally been dry, bare-bones documents outlining the defendant's behavior and the relevant statutes in colorless legal language.

Bybee analyzed the relevant statutes against torture to see exactly how far the military could go in mistreating prisoners without blatant illegality.

Orin Kerr, a former federal prosecutor and assistant professor at George Washington University, said his reading of the relevant statutes put the phone companies at risk for at least $1,000 per person whose records they disclosed without a court order.