Sentence examples for the ranking task from inspiring English sources

Only 4 respondents in our study (1.7%) preserved the rank order of the states in moving from the ranking task to the VAS task (versus 19% in the MVH study).

The Kendall's coefficient of concordance test statistic measured the amount of agreement between participants on how they ranked the order of the response levels for the questions used in the ranking task.

If it is accepted that the ranking task produces the ordinal preferences of the respondent, then the transfer of cards to the VAS allows the respondent an opportunity to correct any mistakes made during the initial ranking task.

From these respondents, 557 (96.37 %) completed the ranking task successfully.

These results demonstrate that existing pathway annotations can be beneficially combined with data annotated for the ranking task.

Third, respondents started the ranking task after they had completed an earlier valuation study concerning EQ-5D health states [ 30].

Once this ranking task was complete the interviewer noted the order of health states and then placed a 1-metre version of the VAS alongside the ranked cards.

In the introductory ranking task, the acute health states were ranked separately from the chronic health states, and rankings ranged from 1 (most preferable health state) to 3 (least preferable health state).

In all three cases, the improvement E → C ranked better than F → B. A comparison between the direct ranking task and the rankings predicted by the four valuation techniques reveals considerable deviation in the predicted rankings on the individual level.

Many docking algorithms, including the eHiTS software utilized in this work [56], are well suited for this ranking task (See Figure S4).

On the presumption that the direct ranking task reflects individuals' preferences to prioritize among the five scenarios best, the number of 'errors' found in each of the implied rankings was calculated.