Sentence examples for the range of discrepancy from inspiring English sources

In this study, the prevalence of Met S was assessed according to all existing definitions (JC, NCEP 2004, NCEP 2001, WHO, IDF, EGIR (Table  1) in order to establish the range of discrepancy between them.

For the purposes of this study, the prevalence of the MetS was analysed according to all existing definitions (NCEP 2004, NCEP 2001, WHO, IDF, EGIR; Table 1) in order to establish the range of discrepancy between them.

Our discrepancy rate of 26% is within the range of discrepancy rates (5%to32%2%) that have been reported for autopsies performed in the general adult ICU population [ 1- 22].

In a follow-up study to assess the range of discrepancy in self-reported sexual identity and sexual behavior in men and women of four racial/ethnic groups, Ross et al. [ 4] found that 43% of the African-American men in their sample who self-identified as heterosexuals were also having sex with other men.

We propose that the range of discrepancies in the importance of heterozygosity for survival and breeding success across HFC analyses may reflect differences in recent immigration and mixing between populations as well as variation in selection pressures [40].

The range of discrepancies, when compared with the consensus sizes obtained by a majority of laboratories for all markers, was 1 40 genotyping errors.

There is a lack of scientific evidence to guide the orthodontist on the range of skeletal discrepancy that is esthetically acceptable.

The small range of discrepancies between the two performance goals and all the other variables (from.02 to.07) supports that premise.

A comparison of the mean and standard deviation (which is normally used as performance criteria) of the generated streamflow series and the historical streamflow series revealed that mean values of generated monthly flows (Table 3) for subbasins of reservoirs and barrage to be in close agreement with the corresponding historical values (range of discrepancy being 0.02 21 %).

The theoretical predictions are compared with the experimental results: within the range of the study, a maximum discrepancy of 10% on surface roughness values between the two was found.

There were no differences in the range of motion or leg length discrepancy in preoperative and postoperative standing.