Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(7)
The questionnaire incorporated 6 multi-item and 7 single-item scales, and was developed following a systematic review of measures appropriate for use in palliative care settings.
The questionnaire incorporated demographic information [ 16- 18], motivation and support for participation, a health history [ 16] and behavioural measures [ 16, 18, 19].
The questionnaire incorporated items to elicit women's past medical, obstetric, and family histories, as well as items to evaluate the intensity and frequency of pelvic pain.
The questionnaire incorporated validated PRO instruments, plus 52 questions focused on ascertaining overall CML disease status, treatment burden, treatment satisfaction, non-adherence, and the physician-provider relationship.
The questionnaire incorporated previously recommended scales and items to measure attitudes and perceived social pressure for a specific action: the treatment of patients with predominantly (more than 50%) classic sub-foveal CNV using photodynamic therapy [ 17].
The questionnaire incorporated questions and measurement scales drawn from existing instruments that have been used and validated in studies conducted in various settings internationally including the Cape Area Panel Study (CAPS) [ 27], the National Study of Youth and Religion [ 28], and the Adolescent Health and Development Questionnaire [ 29].
Similar(53)
The questionnaire incorporates questions modified primarily from the surveys of Davis et al. (2006), Barberi et al. (2008), and Johnston et al. (2012).
The questionnaire incorporates ordinal scales and open-ended questions.
The questionnaire incorporates a four-point Likert scale, with 1 = not at all confident and 4 = very confident.
In each site 100 GPs were randomly selected to receive the questionnaire incorporating the restriction of only one questionnaire per practice.
Two questions from the Irish Census Household Survey (2002) were also included in the questionnaire incorporating questions relating to blindness, deafness, vision or hearing impairment and restriction to functional activities [ 14].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com