Exact(6)
This enabled the questioning guide to be reframed into a strengths-based guide in a timely manner.
The youth collaborators helped develop the questioning guide, facilitated focus groups, took focus group observation notes, participated in open coding exercises and discussed key themes [ 25, 26].
Being mindful of participant safety as well as the aim of the study to identify protective factors and examples of resiliency, the research team including the youth collaborators revised the questioning guide.
Youth collaborator engagement in the research included developing and revising the questioning guide, FG facilitation and note taking, a coding workshop and a knowledge translation event with service providers.
Despite the study's intention to identify resiliency factors, a review of transcripts of the first few FGs noted that the questioning guide and scripted prompts were eliciting 'risk and deficiency' rather than 'resilience and strength-based' answers.
Through regular post FG debriefing and performing ongoing data analysis we were able to identify that participants were eliciting risk rather than resiliency based answers which enabled us to identify the need to revise the questioning guide in a timely manner.
Similar(54)
Despite the success in revising the questioning guides to elicit dialogue around factors that prevent IDU rather than cause it, the research team noted that many of the participants' answers were still framed as negatives.
A semi-structured questioning guide was developed by the research team including the youth collaborators.
A semi-structured questioning guide was developed, pretested, and refined (see Supplementary File 2).
The intentional shift away from a risk framework to one of resilience in this study necessitated an early revision FG questioning guides to ensure that prompts and questions were eliciting information on resiliency and protective factors, rather than negative risk-based dialogues.
The use of clinical protocols were included in two policies (A & E), both indicating that protocols were to be used to guide the questioning process and assist the registered nurse in providing appropriate information to the caller.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com