Thinking about future using an illusion cannot be scientific, so the guiding question of this article is: How can we think about the future in a scientific way?
This is important to construct a proper response to the research question of this article.
The concluding question of this article should be: does Morgan's set of 8 metaphors have value for urban studies?
The leading question of this article reads: how can a legal governance typology assist in handling the complexity of the policy- and decision-making processes about heat infrastructures?
"We didn't predict success," says Carlson, "We just worked in every way we could think of, because unless the hair-trigger cold war was peaceably ended, what else would eventually matter?" It's helpful now to review this under-the-radar citizens movement for the lessons it suggests and then to respond, in a surprising way, to the initial question of this article, about what we can do now.
The key question of this article is: what does devolution mean for human resources for health in Mali?
The main question of this article is whether this rule-based route is uniquely human, as has been posited by some researchers (e.g., Penn et al. 2008).
To sum up, we can reformulate the main substantive question of this article in new terms: how do secularized behaviors such as cohabitation and civil marriage affect subsequent marital stability?
However, "the question of enforcing Article 26," he wrote, is "for the United States, not the plaintiffs, to decide".
The question of interest in this article is: are relatively poorer people more likely to be impacted more severely by catastrophic events?
