Sentence examples for the propositions in question from inspiring English sources

The Jansenists acknowledged the heretical tendencies contained in the propositions and the authority of the decision but denied that the propositions in question could be ascribed to Jansen.

If x, y, z, … are used as individual variables (replaceable by names of individuals) and the symbols ϕ (phi), ψ (psi), χ (chi), … as predicate variables (replaceable by predicates), the formula ϕx is used to express the form of the propositions in question.

Or the propositions in question can be the propositions that are highly probable conditional on the antecedent a, etc.

In this case, what changes is our access to the propositions in question, rather than the propositions themselves.

This network of logical relations strongly suggests that the propositions in question contain a quantificational element and two general elements and in some cases, an element of negation.

Instead of working directly with propositions, we shall work with an artificial interpreted formal language whose sentences express all the propositions in question, and only them.

Russell (1911) required that a propositional attitude holder be acquainted with each of the components of the proposition in question.

At least in certain contexts, members of this school regard the demonstration of the falsity of the negation of a proposition (a proof by reductio ad absurdum) as insufficient to establish the truth of the proposition in question.

In so doing, we are—roughly suggesting that he regards the proposition in question as true.

Of particular interest are the indicator functions that output 1 if the proposition in question is true and 0 otherwise.

If other evident propositions are genuinely in conflict with (i.e., are inconsistent with) the proposition in question, those propositions cannot be evident in the highest degree.