Sentence examples similar to the proportion of learning from inspiring English sources

The usefulness of the e-Portfolio was evaluated by measuring the proportions of learning targets achieved.

We thus proceeded analogously with the learning content: a value at Lnc R higher than zero represents a higher proportion of learning new contents in relation to repetition within the current 7-min interval, and a value at Lnc R lower than zero represents a higher proportion of repetition in relation to dealing with new contents within the current 7-min interval.

The proportion of males that learned the task (80%) was higher than that of females (30%).

As a small reduction in a population's blood pressure can have a sizeable effect on the number of strokes despite blood pressure accounting for only a small variation in stroke, 21 a modest change in the proportion of people who learn 1 or more extra languages could have a population effect on cognitive pathology rates.

It means that the proportion of persons whose perception of learning achievement was "greatly" or "relatively great" was decreasing with age.

In this study we demonstrated that the amount of learning varied for different training stimuli, and the proportion of participants who showed transfer of learning to generalizable outcomes varied for different outcome measures.

The proportion of citizens with staged learning targets decreases with the increase of age.

It means that the proportion of persons who set learning objectives is decreasing with age.

Similarly, we used the mean neuron activity [(Mean (lambda (t))] to measure in a single value the proportion of utilized neurons during learning from stationary and non-stationary data streams.

Our data confirm that the proportion of participants using response learning strategies increases with the number of Met alleles at codon 66 of the BDNF gene.

The proportion of students who rated learning activities as "very useful" or better was 53/55 966%) for practical exercises, 52/55 (94%) for field work, 51/55 (93%) for case studies, 50/55 (91%) for scientific conferences, 37/43 (86%) for field exercises, 39/46 (85%) for mini-contact sessions, 45/55 (82%) for classroom teaching and 45/55 (82%) for one-to-one student-mentor sessions.