The proportion of improvement of the overall model fit relative to the independence model was good (NFI = 0.912), indicating the proposed model was 91.2 % better than the independence model.
Figure 6h shows the distribution of dAUC (i.e., the proportion of improvement of AUC by iASeq over the best single-dataset based ranking method in each dataset) in all 40 datasets.
In each dataset, we computed the proportion of improvement in terms of AUC brought by iASeq over the best single-dataset based ranking method (i.e., dAUC = AU C iAseq − AU C bestsingle AU C bestsingle ).
The proportion of perceived improvement of coldness was calculated and compared between the intervention and control groups by chi-square test.
14 Expressed as a percentage reflecting the proportion of potential improvement actually achieved during rehabilitation, it can be calculated using the formula (BI, Barthel index; DC, discharge; adm, admission; max, maximum possible score): REs are viewed to be superior to AFG/absolute efficacy/total gain because the latter does not take into account the potential maximal functional improvement.
We found an increase, in the short-term, in the proportion of householders reporting improvements in some aspects of their immediate neighbourhood following the urban renewal program.
Post hoc comparisons of the proportion of patients reporting improvements greater than or equal to the MCID for RADAI, RAPID3, and other PROs were performed.
The proportion of comparisons showing improvements in A- and C-cohorts of the same order of magnitude (minimal-to-small effect sizes, range -0.49 to 0.49) was 80.1% (414 of 517 comparisons).
Across all five of these PROs – PtGA, Pain, HAQ-DI, SF-36 PCS, and FACIT-F – the proportion of patients reporting improvements ≥ the MCID ranged from 61 73 % for 5 mg BID and 65 77 % for 10 mg BID.
Post hoc comparisons of the proportion of patients reporting improvements ≥MCID for each PRO were performed using repeated-measures logistic regression with region, treatment, time and treatment by time interactions as factors and baseline scores as covariates.
