Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

the process lasted for hours

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "the process lasted for hours" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a situation where a particular process or activity took a significant amount of time to complete. Example: "The meeting was unproductive, and the process lasted for hours, leaving everyone frustrated."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Hug, photo, sign, smile, hug – the process lasts for hours.

The process lasts for hours — if the actors fumble a line or miss a mark, they have to start over.

News & Media

Los Angeles Times

The process lasts for two days.

News & Media

The Guardian

The curing process lasted for 35 days.

The process lasts minutes rather than hours, he said.

News & Media

The New York Times

The ceremony lasted for hours.

News & Media

The New York Times

The standoff lasted for hours.

News & Media

The Guardian

Scroll down for more picThees.

News & Media

Vice

The operation lasted for 11 hours without immediate complications.

In normal cells and in animals, ligand-dependent activation of the STATs is a transient process, lasting for several minutes to several hours.

Given that the apoptotic process may last for hours, these two waves of apoptosis might be distinguished in a wide time frame.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "the process lasted for hours", ensure that the context clearly defines the process being referred to. Avoid ambiguity by providing specific details about what the process entails.

Common error

Avoid using "the process lasted for hours" when a more specific timeframe is known. If you know the process lasted, for example, three hours and twenty minutes, use that more precise duration instead.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "the process lasted for hours" functions as a statement of duration. It indicates the length of time that a particular process or activity continued.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

35%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "the process lasted for hours" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to describe the duration of an activity. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. Its neutral tone makes it suitable for various contexts, including news, scientific reports, and general communication. While there aren't exact matches in the provided examples, many similar sentences demonstrate the phrase's versatility. Remember to ensure context clarifies the specific process and avoid overgeneralizing the timeframe. You can use alternatives like "the procedure took several hours" or "the activity spanned several hours" for variety.

FAQs

How can I use "the process lasted for hours" in a sentence?

You can use "the process lasted for hours" to describe the duration of a specific activity, for example: "The negotiation "process lasted for hours" before a resolution was reached."

What are some alternatives to "the process lasted for hours"?

Alternatives include "the "procedure took several hours"", "the "operation ran for hours"", or "the "activity spanned several hours"".

Is it correct to say "the process lasted hours" without the "for"?

While grammatically understandable, adding "for" after "lasted" and before the time duration is generally preferred for clarity and standard usage. Therefore, "the process lasted hours" is less common and can sound slightly awkward.

What is the difference between saying "the process lasted for hours" and "the process took hours"?

Both phrases convey a similar meaning, but "the process "lasted for hours"" focuses on the duration of the process, while "the process "took hours"" emphasizes the time the process required. They are often interchangeable but can have subtle differences in emphasis.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: