"the problem at issue" is a correct and commonly used phrase in written English.
It is typically used to refer to the main or central problem being discussed or debated in a particular situation or context. For example: - "In today's meeting, we will be discussing the problem at issue: how to increase efficiency in our production process." - "The government is facing criticism for not addressing the problem at issue - the escalating crime rates in the city." - "The article explores the problem at issue - the impact of social media on mental health." - "The court case will focus on the problem at issue: the breach of contract between the two parties."
The problem at issue is very serious.
The paper is complements with a discussion on how these conditions can be actually exploited in the design of a controller that solves the problem at issue.
What comes next is one of those libertarian environmental arguments that's supposed to sound brilliantly counterintuitive, while actually displaying an appalling moral blindness to the problem at issue: We can keep the elephants alive only by keeping alive the demand for ivory, since that alone is what gives elephants their value.
Thus, according to Sharpe, explaining individuation means explaining how a multiplicity of individuals can be obtained from a single specific nature, the problem at issue being the dialectical development from one to many and not the passage from abstract to concrete.
In this context, a possible path to explore would be the use of reinforcement learning, which stands for the family of algorithms whose performance is adapted to the problem at issue with the successive use of rewards and penalties as the task is either accomplished or not.
The problem at issue is a provision in the president's lease with the General Services Administration that specifically says no elected officeholder can be a party to the lease.
While the problems at issue in the sophismata are taken as logico-grammatical, it is possible to distinguish between logical, grammatical and physical sophismata.
They've been pioneering a form of deciding upon public policy where people actually think through the problems at issue, think about them, consider solutions, test a few of them, then implement the best.
In presenting his model, Ross made the crucial point that "the mathematical method of treatment is really nothing but the application of careful reasoning to the problems at issue" (1 ).
Does it seem that the interpretation of the clause offered there has anything to do with the lost- volume problem at issue in Neri?
Had the public analysis sorted out the problem at hand, the issues of trauma, fear and mastery that lie behind creative fiction?
