Sentence examples for the predictions achieved from inspiring English sources
The residuals obtained by comparing observed versus predicted values (i.e., the predictions achieved by the system models) are normalized subject to the uncertainty of the models and are supervised by an incrementally adaptive statistical tolerance band.
Further the predictions achieve quantitative agreement with experimental data from several studies across a wide range of average nanograin sizes.
This is similar to the prediction achieved by complex multigene PCR-based assay systems (Paik et al, 2004).
Based on the expression pattern of identified 37 genes, the prediction achieved corresponded to a false positive rate of 0.12 and false negative rate of 0.26.
The results of both these regression analyses are consistent: the martial arts variable (represented by the set of three dummy variables) is not statistically significant and does not improve the prediction achieved by time one behavior alone.
Deep sequencing data did not consistently modify the susceptibility predictions achieved with population sequencing for darunavir, tipranavir or raltegravir.
This result further supports that the new TFBS predictions achieved essentially the same specificity as the old TFBS predictions while significantly improving the overall coverage of the yeast transcriptional network.
However, notwithstanding the comparable-to-superior predictions achieved by the proposed models, it is important to statistically validate these results.
Here, the threshold of ArathMitoP LR (Likelihood Ratio) is set at 1.37, so that the integrated predictions achieve the least false positives rate (2.53%) and the largest coverage of true predictions (84.67%) based on the comparison with GSN∼mito and GSPmito at the same time (Fig. 1, and Fig. 2).
This is consistent with the observed behavior of the average error and again is explained by the naturally higher accuracy of predictions achieved with larger n-spheres.
The comparison of pre-test and post test probabilities in our patients was used as a measure of improvement in the diagnostic prediction achieved by the use of the lymphocyte test.
