Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
For the dysfunction scale, the possible scale range is 0-4.0.
Looking at the possible scale range, this indicates a relatively active search and selection behaviour of the participants.
For mental health outcomes (Depression, Post-traumatic Stress, Anxiety and Traumatic Grief) the possible scale range is 0-3.0.
The mean and SD multi-attribute utility scores derived from the EQ-5D instrument (0.562, SD =0.298) and EQ-VAS score (63.3, SD =19.5) were not high relative to the possible scale range, indicating that impairments in health-related quality of life were prevalent in this clinical population.
Similar(56)
cCalculated as actual scale range divided by possible scale range multiplied by 100.
Among our North American study sites, we observed moderately high levels of mean social capital scores ranging from 2.53 ± 0.56 in California to 2.79 ± 0.55 in North Carolina (possible scale range 1 4, higher values signify greater perceived social capital).
The observed scale scores covered most of the possible score range.
Possible scores for the ADQ Total scale range from 19 to 95; possible scores for the ADQ Hope subscale range from 8 to 40 and possible scores for the ADQ PC Scale range from 11 to 55. Ethical approval for the project was obtained from both the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) and the Queensland Health (QH Human Research Ethics Committeess prior to survey distribution.
The prevalence of patients for the worst possible scores (floor effects) was higher for the NHP scale (range 0 12.0%) compared with the SF-36 (range 0 1.2%).
Values 1 5 were attached to the response alternatives, added for the highloading items, and divided by the number of items; thus, the possible range of scale values is from 1 to 5. The higher scale values, the more are parents perceived as responsive, demanding, neglecting, and intrusive, respectively.
The possible range of scale scores was 0 to 10.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com