Sentence examples for the permitted amount of from inspiring English sources

During 1935 harvest, a survey was made of the chief orchards of the state: out of 179 Connecticut apples that you ate in September 1935, only 35 contained more than the permitted amount of arsenic.

During the last month, regulators and quality inspectors say they have discovered candied fruit with 63 times the permitted amount of sweetener; excessive additives and preservatives in nearly 40percentt of the children's snacks surveyed in western Guangxi province; fake human blood protein at hospitals; and food tainted with formaldehyde, illegal dyes and industrial wax.

The permitted amount of new calls increases when σ is fixed and ψ increases.

On average, 59.2% of the permitted amount of extracted ground water was used per year in the time period 1997 to 2004.

Recent incident in the Fukushima power plant caused a growing concern about the radiation contamination and resulted in lowering the Japanese limits for the permitted amount of 137Cs in food to 100 Bq/kg.

For this reason, the committee has recommended that the permissible level of radiation emitted from mobile phone towers be reduced by one-tenth the current value and that India adopt the U.S. standard for the permitted amount of radiation exposure from handsets.

Some studies of herbicide detection using PSII have reported a limit of detection for atrazine of a few nanomolar, which is in the region of the maximum permitted amount of an individual pesticide in the EU.

The latest issue to hobble the company is the renewed allegation that its flagship drink in India contains 27 times the maximum permitted amount of pesticides.

A supranational environmental authority decides for each country on the maximally permitted amount of greenhouse gas emissions.

(7, or neutral, is normal).Yet Greenpeace says that toxin levels in the sludge are much higher than the government admits, with arsenic at 25 times the permitted amount, and significant levels of mercury and chrome.

The office is examining whether the agencies took fees from clients in exchange for jobs that never materialized or paid below the minimum wage, refused to give refunds, charged fees in excess of the permitted amount, lacked proper licenses or violated civil rights law by referring clients to jobs based on their nationality or gender.