Suggestions(5)
Exact(50)
We next examined the effect of target structure quality on the performance of methods.
In the first we consider the performance of methods to identify 3-class (positive, negative and neutral).
Similar conclusions can be drawn from Figure 6b, where the performance of methods is compared in terms of receiver operating characteristics, i.e. using CDZR 1 and FAZR curves.
As a result, the performance of methods based on coherent fusion of these Doppler signatures may significantly degrade depending on the phase interactions.
Therefore, in the presence of noise, the performance of Methods 1-5 may not be as good as those in the noiseless environments.
The application of the theory depends upon the performance of methods for estimating the distribution parameters corresponding to any given set of extreme data.
Similar(10)
The performance of method is average performance of method on five sets.
The performances of methods 5 and 7 were similar and outstanding in several important respects.
Outliers had several evident detrimental effects on the performances of methods 1 to 4 and 6.
This explains why our method parallels the performance of semantic methods without explicitly weighting edge types.
With a recall significantly lower than manual method, the performance of our method seemed insufficient.
More suggestions(13)
the performance of others
the performance of measures
the performance of steps
the performance of measurements
the performance of approaches
the varieties of methods
the efficiencies of methods
the results of methods
the performance of mode
the performance of approach
the usage of methods
the appropriateness of methods
the status of methods
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com