For what it is worth, McTaggart's work on Hegel does not appear to be highly regarded by contemporary scholars of Hegel, insofar as this is reflected in the paucity of references to McTaggart's interpretations.[1] In what follows, I will spend little time on those works of McTaggart that occupy themselves with the Hegelian philosophy.
Instead the paucity of references underlines that a phenomenon is under study that so far was not.
The paucity of suitable reference genomes is a major obstacle in the interpretation of metagenomic data.
This, however, is only a small part of the reason for the paucity of Japanese references.
The discussion in the present article is based on group discussion and primarily comes from the nursing literature, given the paucity of published references on this topic from other disciplines providing ICU care (e.g. medical doctor, respiratory therapy, pharmacy, social work, dietetics, physiotherapy, occupational and speech therapy) [ 4- 8].
But given the paucity of Copernicus's references to Neoplatonism and a single incorrect reference to Hermes Trismegistus, this assumes that Copernicus must have been under the influence of Neoplatonism simply because it was one of the many philosophies available to him and this seemed most likely.
Moreover, there remains a paucity of reference data reflecting the typical daily patterns and profiles of normal glycemia in the healthy population, negatively impacting the general application of the CGM technique and the rational interpretation of the data obtained.
High sequencing costs and a paucity of reference genomes initially restricted large-scale sequencing and marker development to a handful of model systems [ 7, 8].
A reason for correct placements without high bootstrap support and incorrect placements with more than 50% bootstrap support was the paucity of substitutions in the section of the reference alignment that overlaps with the query sequence.
