Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "the path coefficient between" is correct and can be used in written English
You can use it when referring to the magnitude of the relationship between two variables when they are predicted by one or more other variables. For example: "The path coefficient between poverty and education was 0.523."
Exact(11)
The path coefficient between trust and use intention was unremarkable.
The path coefficient between entrepreneurial strategy and entrepreneurial implementation is 0.558.
The path coefficient between the two constructs is the lowest value, among other paths, at 0.247.
The results show that IEC does not directly affect entrepreneurial implementation because the path coefficient between the two constructs is insignificant.
The path coefficient between AI and AO is 0.609 (p < 0.01), which is a significant positive correlation, indicating that proper planned AI increases the productivity of AO, which contributes to the improved fuel efficiency.
The path coefficient between AI and ATD is 0.042 (p > 0.05), which is a positive but not significant correlation, indicating that AI has no significant positive impact on ATD.
Similar(49)
In addition, the path coefficients between all main contrasts and consumer behavior did not significantly differ between these two models.
Third, we studied differences in the path coefficients between different wealth classes by analysing interactions between the wealth class and selected path coefficients using general linear mixed models (GLMMs).
The numbers reported in Figure 7 are the path coefficients between each region.
The LM test indicated that the path coefficients between I to A were significantly different for men and women (path coefficients = 0.75 (men) and 0.62 (women), p = <0.01).
Mediation was tested by calculating the path coefficients between (a) the endophenotypic construct and the factor, (b) the factor and the phenotype, and (c) the endophenotypic construct and phenotype (see Figure 2).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com