Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(12)
The paragraph in question has been removed.
In drafting the paragraph in question, the clear and well-established standards of evidence, required by the IPCC procedures, were not applied properly".
The paragraph in question gives the Home Office the discretionary right to deport migrants "in the light of his conduct … character or associations or the fact that he represents a threat to national security".
But, the paragraph in question follows a discussion about what should have been known before the signing of the Merger Agreement, so I consider the issue as if the matters in 24 were discussed before signing.
In drafting the paragraph in question, the clear and well-established standards of evidence, required by the IPCC procedures, were not applied properly". It added: "The IPCC regrets the poor application of well-established IPCC procedures in this instance". But the statement calls for no action beyond stating a need for absolute adherence to IPCC quality control processes.
Here's the paragraph in question from Morgan's book: Apparently if you don't change the standard security code that every phone comes with, then anyone can call your number and, if you don't answer, tap in the standard four digit code to hear all your messages.
Similar(48)
The paragraphs in question largely involved descriptions of historical events and context about gun control in America and do not seem anywhere near as serious as other famed plagiarists – such as Jayson Blair at the New York Times and Stephen Glass at the New Republic who made up entire quotes, people and incidents.
The specific paragraph in question now attempts to show that while the RIL population may be susceptible to the rare allele issues, we have similar if not greater phenotypic variation than the accessions, meaning that we actually have better power to detect loci and interactions.
7) The paragraph in the Discussion beginning "The study opens up important questions.... ........ should be deleted.
The original story was corrected later (you just can't make this stuff up, folks!) by striking out the term "half-joking" and adding at the bottom of the paragraph: "The somebody in question wanted to clarify that he is not at all joking, not even halfway, and is indeed fully rooting for Hillary Clinton".
The paragraph of the leaflet in question reads: "Most people I know here have worked hard all their life, played by the rules and paid their fair share.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com