It is important to note that the correlation threshold (T) may significantly influence the identification of the neighbors (i.e., links), and hence, the outcomes of the methods.
The inclusion of decreasing Ωa (decreasing ocean pH) does not appear to significantly change the outcomes of the methods presented, beyond lowering long-term estimates of coral cover to some degree (on the order of 20% 30% at the end of century).
This implies that, if M1 and M2 are significantly different, there is a confidence level of 95% that the differences between the outcomes of the methods are not caused by random variation.
The outcome of the method is an "extended Davenport peak factor" (EDPF) that relates the descriptors of the resultant, the parameters of the distribution function of the peaks, and the probability of not exceeding a given threshold.
However, the outcome of the method effect indicates that differences in responses to negatively worded items are worth studying in their own right, and not just as substantively irrelevant artefact/noise that are theoretically uninteresting and need to be eliminated (cf. Marsh 1996).
We observed that different combinations of 4 centralities were sufficient to detect the 22 most central proteins, although the results did not correspond exactly with the outcomes of the original method (i.e., the 22 proteins were classified in two clusters of larger size).
The MRSA252 spots were also analysed with the new analysis methods to compare the outcome of the methods with that of the GACK method.
According to the experimental results, it is shown that the outcomes of the two methods were very close to each other in terms of their accuracies.
A Chinese study [4] which compared PCA with the principal axis factoring reported no significant difference in the outcomes of the two methods.
Summarizing, there are only few sectors for which the outcomes of the different methods show a difference in the range of 1.0-3.5 1.0-3.5 sectors are clear outliers in the boxplots of Figure 1).
