Sentence examples for the odds of identifying from inspiring English sources

Using a Bonferroni corrected α of 0.008 0.05/66), a series of logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate if for any given age, the odds of identifying an incidental finding was different between sexes, for any of the six individual anatomic regions.

The odds of identifying false positives were minimized by excluding non-canonical sequences, or sequences that contained nucleotide mismatches.

Amongst patient characteristics, increasing age increased the odds of identifying acute ischaemic change and of agreeing with the reference standard on the scale rating, but stroke severity as assessed by the NIHSS had no effect.

To increase the odds of identifying novel regulators of lysosomal trafficking and autophagy, we designed a screen to identify mutations that activate or derepress, as opposed to block, lysosomal accumulation.

This approach improves the odds of identifying genes that impact aging rather than some other process or characteristic (Swindell, 2007; Kent et al., 2012).

The odds of identifying an asymmetrical structural cerebral lesion rather than IE increased 1.6-fold with each additional year of age at seizure onset.

Those aged 60 years had a significantly higher adjusted odds of recognising the benefits of social activity, but the lowest odds of identifying non-smoking (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09-0.91) as a beneficial action.

A funnel plot of the log odds of identifying reassorted viruses in (a) swine hosts and (b) China across all years analysed in this study.

A significant difference in response based on gender was identified for statement 10 at T2 where the odds of boys identifying that what you eat mattered a lot was 0.4 times that of girls, p = 0.009.

The odds of correctly identifying RHD positive and RHD negative fetuses increased significantly with gestational age, with low levels of false negative results after 11 weeks' gestation.

Furthermore, the odds of correctly identifying other disease-causing mutations as having no effect on tumour progression were 75.48 (CI: 59.70, 96.17) times greater when using a cancer-specific weighting scheme.