"the object of evaluation" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used when referencing something that is being evaluated or assessed. Here is an example: "The new employee's work performance was the object of evaluation during their probationary period." In this sentence, "the object of evaluation" refers to the focus or subject of the evaluation process, which is the new employee's work performance. This phrase can also be used in other contexts, such as academic research or product reviews.
In order to define the object of evaluation, this paper relies on a literature study on collaboration resulting in an ECORE meta-model of collaborative processes.
In the process of model reliability, a trend examination method is presented, which checks the reliability of the model via the influence trend of impact factors on the object of evaluation and their evaluation level.
Moral assessors take up a "common point of view" from which the assessor can appreciate how everyone who is affected by the object of evaluation (e.g., a character trait of a particular person) is affected by it.
Duranti (2004) defines agency as "the property of those entities (1) that have some degree of control over their own behavior, (2) whose actions in the world affect other entities (and sometimes their own), and (3) whose actions are the object of evaluation" (p. 453).
Furthermore, social influence effects are weaker when the object of evaluation is more consequential [21].
Lessons Learned (Optional): 5. Gender, human rights and equity considerations The focus on human rights observation is fundamental to the entire design of the programme that represented the object of evaluation.
Their difference is determined by the performances of the objects of evaluation.
In this discussion, the terms "property and project" are used interchangeably as the objects of evaluation.
In the studies providing validity findings, the objects of evaluation were general purpose work support systems or general public websites, potentially explaining why the users did not make findings more complementary to that of the classical usability test.
In response to published objections and queries (Nathan Berall 1951, James L. Jarrett 1952, Robert Hoffman 1962), he later drew a distinction between what he proposed to call 'the control object' (that he had previously referred to as the 'physical work of art' or 'the vehicle') and the object of critical evaluation (previously, 'the aesthetic work of art').
A less heavily freighted way of motivating the distinction in aesthetics is to say, along with Pepper and others, that reference to the vehicle or artistic structure alone does not suffice to identify the object of critical evaluation, or what artistic and aesthetic appreciation is really about.
