Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(9)
The model weight each capacity domain differently, based on the experts' opinions regarding which domains are most important to strengthening organisations' capacity to use research in policy.
For the high-density era, the model that incorporated time- and age-based survival had over 99.9%% of the model weight (Table 2).
However, in the model, weight changed over time, hence the actual annual cost of insulin (with dosage according to weight) in the economic analysis varies according to the simulated change in weight.
Neither first-year or adult survival varied with gender (the general model, ϕ (age*time) p time) was allocated > 99.9%% of the model weight; Table 3); therefore, male and females were pooled for all subsequent analyses.
For the low-density era and over all values of ĉ, > 74 % of the model weight was allocated to models with first-year survival varying with SOI measured during the pregnant mother's pre-partum foraging trip (Table 4; Fig. 3A).
The best model for the upper Eocene sample therefore favours two ellipsoidal clusters with equal shape (the model weight for this model alone was 0.611, Table 3) but of different abundance (155 and 45 individuals in each).
Similar(51)
Create a plot of the model weights for the default dataset and then change to a logarithmic scale for both axes.
Over time, this will change, since the model weights the polls more and the economic index less as we get closer to the election.
That's not to say the model weights all the polls equally: high-quality national polls have an especially big influence on the trendlines that we estimate.
Visualization of the model weights showed that p-p38 and p-JNK variables associated more closely with infected cells, while p-ERK and p-IκBα variables associated with uninfected cells.
We combine Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) with worth-of-data analysis and investigate how decisive the model weights are under different selections of data types.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com