Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(15)
The method was proved to be viable.
The intra- and inter-assay precisions were satisfactory and the accuracy of the method was proved.
The accuracy of the method was proved; the mean recovery of VRC was 100.10 ± 1.08%.
Finally, the method was proved to be reproducible, fast, and accurate in comparison with the previous conventional methods.
The method was proved as valid and useful for assessment of the changes in enamel surface demineralization [29, 30].
The accuracy of the method was proved as the recovery % of GFX from spiked human plasma was 94.21 101.85%.
Similar(45)
The performance and efficiency of the method was proven using several simulations.
However, the method was proven partially inefficient during the repetitive calculation of joint angles for anatomical landmark compensation.
The Pareto-optimal solution sets were analyzed, and the method was proven to be useful for the optimization of indoor humidity.
The test results were in good agreement with the theoretical value within passband, as determined by contrast analysis, and the validity of the method was proven.
The applicability of the method was proven during in-situ measurements of a hall made of arch-shaped (18 m span) self-supporting metal-plates.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com