Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(4)
The maximum discrepancy in the results reached approximately 2 ns.
The maximum discrepancy in alpha angle measurement between the 2 methods was 13.5 degrees in a cadaver femur and 10.8 degrees in a radiograph.
The analysis was stopped until the maximum discrepancy in frequencies of bipartitions was below 0.3, which indicated that the samples had given a good qualitative picture of the posterior consensus [ 56].
Chains were stopped when the maximum discrepancy in bipartition frequencies and several additional summary variables (including the alpha parameter for across-site rate variation, tree length, mean posterior log-likelihood) between the two chains dropped below 0.1, and the effective sizes of the summary variables were all more than 100, as recommended by the authors.
Similar(56)
The maximum discrepancies in the pore pressure response of the formulations leading to validity regions are illustrated for typical dynamic problems.
We used the automatic stopping rule feature of PhyloBayes and ran two chains in parallel until the maximum discrepancy between the columns of the trace files of the chains was less than 0.1 and the effective sizes of each column in the trace files were greater than 100.
Results show that the heat pipe reaches the normal operation in 6 min, in good agreement with experimental data with the maximum discrepancy of 16%.
Two MCMC chains were run in parallel for 5000 cycles, at which point the maximum discrepancy (maxdiff) value reached 0.009 (maxdiff <0.1 is considered sufficient).
The maximum discrepancy across the discontinuity is approximately 1.6 m.
Results from Table 3 show good agreement, and the maximum discrepancy is 5.07% (Mode 3).
The maximum discrepancy was 5 mm.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com