Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(28)
The maximum discrepancy is less than 0.02 eV, which is within the inherent accuracy of the methodology.
The maximum discrepancy is about 0.2 eV, with the majority of the band gaps slightly overestimated and a few slightly underestimated.
The simulation results showed good agreement with the experimental data with the maximum discrepancy of about 5.4%.
The soot volume fraction was predicted with the maximum discrepancy less than 30% for all cases considered.
Results show that the heat pipe reaches the normal operation in 6 min, in good agreement with experimental data with the maximum discrepancy of 16%.
The maximum discrepancy between the simulations and measurements is relatively small, corresponding to the expected uncertainty of the model and measurements.
Similar(32)
The maximum discrepancies between the simulated and measured results are 0.14, 0.42 and 1.13 mV, respectively.
The maximum discrepancies in the pore pressure response of the formulations leading to validity regions are illustrated for typical dynamic problems.
The maximum discrepancies between the experimental and calibrated measurement values of resistance were less than 0.5%.
MRI score is 1 (normal), 2 (mildly abnormal) and 3 (severely abnormal) The maximum discrepancies between the experimental and theoretical values of impedance and phase in R1 − (R2||C) measurements were 2.6 and 5.4%, respectively.
The theoretical predictions are compared with the experimental results: within the range of the study, a maximum discrepancy of 10% on surface roughness values between the two was found.
More suggestions(13)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com