Quebec rapidly modernized and the francophone majority asserted control over Quebec's education system, politics, business, etc.
Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the court's majority, asserted that prosecution for accidental partial births won't occur; there has to be "intent" for there to be a crime.
In the Citizens United case on campaign financing, members of the majority who asserted that the key to constitutional interpretation lies in the original intent of the Constitution's framers ignored the position of corporate structures when the Constitution was drafted, in order to extend political rights to corporations never contemplated by those who drafted the document.
For the majority, Justice Clarence Thomas asserts that Mr. Thompson failed to prove that the office "disregarded a known or obvious consequence" of its inaction.
The majority opinion, however, asserts that employers now must have more than just statistical proof in order to justify canceling the test results or establishing a new policy.
In a narrow 5-4 decision, the majority of justices asserted that corporate spending in politics is an act of free speech and should therefore be unlimited.
The majority of respondents asserted that the doctors listened to their concerns about the patient's medical treatment (87%), and that relatively few care decisions were made about without adequate input from the family (11%).
The majority of respondents asserted that TB can happen more than once in a lifetime, even after successful completion of treatment, but early treatment is required if someone becomes affected with TB.
But as Tinniswood asserts, the majority survived.
While the vast majority simply assert and defend the common view, sometimes an unusual expert will innovate or be helpful to an innovator.
