Sentence examples for the logic of knowledge from inspiring English sources

Dynamic Epistemic Logic (DEL) is the logic of knowledge change; it is not about one particular logical system, but about a whole family of logics that allow us to specify static and dynamic aspects of knowledge and beliefs of agents (cf. Van Ditmarsch et al. 2007).

Second, we do not need to add anything to the logic of knowledge: the "right" properties of belief fall out of our definitions and the properties of knowledge.

The ultimate goal of this paper is to further assess the logic of knowledge and commitments (CTLKC+) from a new perspective (i.e., the soundness and completeness).

Epistemic logic is the logic of knowledge and belief.

Modern treatments of the logic of knowledge and belief grow out of the work of a number of philosophers and logicians writing from 1948 through the 1950s.

In De Sophisiticis Elenchis as well as in the Prior and Posterior Analytics Aristotle mentions some aspects of the logic of knowledge and belief.

We compare different epistemic notions in the presence of awareness of propositional variables: the logic of implicit knowledge (in which explicit knowledge is definable), the logic of explicit knowledge, and the logic of speculative knowledge.

On this view, since a philosophical account of knowledge does not appeal to an independent faculty of sensible intuition, Cohen insists that the project he had previously called the "critique of knowledge" now becomes the "logic of pure knowledge".

We show that the logic of speculative knowledge is as expressive as the logic of explicit knowledge, and the logic of implicit knowledge is more expressive than the two other logics.

Knorr et al. (2011) [9] formulated a three-valued formalism for the logic of Minimal Knowledge and Negation as Failure (MKNF), and proposed a well-founded semantics for hybrid MKNF knowledge bases.

The System included The Logic of Pure Knowledge, The Ethics of Pure Will, and The Aesthetics of Pure Feeling.