Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
TechCrunch editors pored over the judges' notes and, after hours of deliberations, narrowed the list down to six finalists: online kid safety service Bark, interactive Twitch alternative Beam, Blockchain credit startup for emerging countries BitPagos, daily vitamin maker Ritual, underwater drone SeaDrone and ultra-affordable water filtration system WaterO.
Based on the answers we received, a short list was presented to the judges: in-person and on-the-phone deliberations then ensued.
High on the list, the results mirrored Science staffers' own deliberations.
After many deliberations, our judges narrowed the list down to five finalists: Fogo Digital, Looksee, Peeple, Sutro, Voltera.
After hours of deliberations, TechCrunch editors pored over the judges' notes and narrowed the list down to five finalists: Collider, Domuso, NuCypher, RecordGram and Sunrise Health.
After hours of deliberations, TechCrunch editors pored over the judges' notes and narrowed the list down to five finalists: Blik, Caspar Health, eTrack Tech, Lia Diagnostics and Wandelbots.
After hours of deliberations, TechCrunch editors pored over the judges' notes and narrowed the list down to six finalists: BlazingDB, Carbon Health, EverlyWell, Mobalytics, Sqreen and UnifyID.
After many deliberations, TechCrunch editors pored over the judges' notes and narrowed the list down to five finalists: Glowee, IOV, Mapify, Wakeo and Wingly.
After hours of deliberations, TechCrunch editors pored over the judges' notes and narrowed the list down to five finalists: Imago AI, Kalepso, Legacy, Polyteia and Spike.
After hours of deliberations, TechCrunch editors pored over the judges' notes and narrowed the list down to five finalists: CB Therapeutics, Forethought, Mira, Origami Labs and Unbound.
After hours of deliberations, TechCrunch editors pored over the judges' notes and narrowed the list down to six finalists: Augmedics, colormass, Future Family, Matic, Onēva and Pi.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com