Sentence examples for the lack of sharing from inspiring English sources
Much consternation over the lack of sharing.
For some major publishing brands, early attempts at pushing their print copy through the digital sausage factory have been met with unhappy customers who complain about the lack of sharing within the apps, long download times, irrationally high pricing and a confusing user interface.
Some blamed the lack of sharing capabilities, as only friends with 3D handsets would be able to receive pictures or videos from the devices.
Unfortunately, as of today, too many published studies remain irreproducible due to the lack of sharing of data, computer code or software required to reproduce the study results.
Although the logistics of communicating health knowledge is the justification used by physicians to explain the lack of explanation given to patients, one can see how the lack of sharing of knowledge acts to exacerbate unequal physician-patient power relations.
Another alternative possibility would be that the lake was colonized from a source other than the large lakes, e.g., a river, thus explaining the lack of sharing of mtDNA haplotypes with their populations.
Other women join us and the lack of shared language doesn't dissuade us from humour and talking about our families.
When I ask for a capsule summary to explain the lack of shared prosperity, he replies that "Inadequate political engagement is basically the headline.
But many investigators said the lack of shared intelligence has forced them to turn to cable television news channels for information about the case and to seek out sensitive information from friends and colleagues.
Jim Strickland, a veterans advocate, said the lack of shared system meant that many doctors in the veterans health care system did not know details about the medical histories of veterans they treated, such as medications prescribed in Iraq or Afghanistan.
– and about whether it spurred them to greater heights or the lack of shared information restricted their progress) or just the normal way of things (in which case, why are we talking about them rather than any other pair?) By the end you could only ask – should a science documentary be raising so many more questions than it answers?
