The completeness proof for \(\mathsf{J}\) and the other justification logics mentioned above can easily be modified to establish completeness with respect to single world justification models, though of course this was not the original argument.
The only mentioned justification for the choice (i.e., showing that avalanches can arise solely from within cortex and sensitive to excitation-inhibition ratio) is somewhat weak given the wealth of cited in-vitro records showing exactly this (Beggs and Plenz, 2003, 2004; Shew et al., 2009; Pasquale et al., 2008; Stewart and Plenz, 2006).
Even if guidelines have also been recently published for PRO based studies [ 20, 21], the reporting of such studies often lacks mentioning the justification of study size and its computation.
Several justifications are mentioned in the literature.
A justification of the above mentioned predictions is given, based on a large body of simulations carried out so far.
The Enterprise Zones Kemp was so fond of, which provided extensive tax breaks in targeted areas to attract investment, were first hatched during the Reagan Administration with the justification that "cities are not mentioned in the Constitution".
As with the acromion stadia mentioned above, the justification is that this has been implemented in the more recent version of the code shared with us.
Another possible line is the one mentioned in §2 to strengthen the justification condition to rule out Gettier cases as justified.
The justification contained in this passage never mentions economic goods like oil or political issues like Israel, most notably because the first was not relevant at the time and the second did not exist.
Justifications for the publicity requirement mentioned above do not suffice to provide grounds to establish the need to guarantee the mutual assurance among citizens that such public rules are effectively complied with, and known to be so.[72] This just gives an idea of how wide the scope of the publicity requirement may be in Rawls's own work and how diverse its justifications are.
